The four steps to give effective constructive feedback are as follows:
- Define the goal of the feedback.
- Give the feedback in person.
- Be specific in your feedback.
- Suggest a plan and follow up.
Constructive criticism is a form of feedback that aims to enhance the performance of dev team members in a specific area. Engineering managers should focus on communicating specific, actionable suggestions in a respectful and supportive manner. When providing constructive criticism, the focus is on encouraging team members’ growth and learning in order to directly enhance project outcomes. This feedback should be grounded in the team’s skill set and shared understanding of project goals with the aim of presenting viable solutions to the challenges.
While constructive criticism is straightforward in its approach, offering clear examples and solutions for improvement, deconstructive criticism focuses on pointing out what’s wrong without offering any insight or suggestions on how to improve. It’s important that managers adopt the constructive criticism framework in order to cultivate a supportive and collaborative environment in the workplace.
As with any feedback, constructive criticism has a framework with three key components:
Specificity: Constructive criticism should provide detailed criticism and avoid vague comments.
Objectivity: The criticism needs to be unbiased and based on factual observations, ensuring that the criticism is not mixed with personal opinions.
Actionability: The criticism needs to cover the practical steps that are required to overcome the shortcomings so that the team members can avoid making the same mistake in the future.
Constructive criticism offers multiple benefits, such as the following:
Improves dev performance: Constructive criticism helps individuals identify where they need to improve in order to achieve better outcomes, improving developers' productivity and enhancing their abilities in other professional endeavors.
Strengthens relationships among team members: Constructive criticism fosters a positive atmosphere where trust, collaboration, and transparency are promoted in an open communication channel.
Boosts confidence and self-esteem: When constructive criticism is combined with the acknowledgment of efforts, team members feel seen and valued, which significantly impacts their self-esteem and confidence.
Engineering managers should give constructive criticism to their dev teams in the following scenarios:
When guidelines are overlooked: In case of any deviation from coding standards or project guidelines, engineering managers should hold immediate conversations to give constructive criticism.
To encourage professional growth: When engineering managers identify areas where their team members may be lagging, this calls for constructive criticism on a team member’s skills enhancement.
To address ineffective former feedback: Sometimes, engineering managers present constructive criticism that doesn’t lead to improvements in work or behavior. In such a situation, it is necessary to hold a deeper discussion to uncover underlying issues and collaboratively find solutions.
To resolve conflicts: Conflicts are a regular part of office discourse. When misunderstanding occurs, managers should step up and opt for dialogue with their team members over avoidance. This is the time for managers to offer constructive criticism and address the issues.
When offering constructive criticism, it’s important for engineering managers to adopt an approach with empathy and respect. Giving constructive criticism to tech teams effectively requires engineering managers to balance technical understanding with interpersonal skills. Here are five steps you can follow to make feedback a positive experience:
Prepare the feedback
Set a positive tone
Be specific and objective
Follow up and support
Engineering managers should gather specific examples and data to support their feedback before the meeting. Preparation before the meeting ensures that the comments and suggestions are fact-based and relevant to the team’s objectives.
Next, managers should acknowledge the team members’ recent successes or improvements to start the meeting positively. When team members feel that their hard work is appreciated and valued, it creates a receptive atmosphere where team members know that they are being seen.
Managers should clearly articulate what needs improvement and why. Specific instances or project outcomes help illustrate the main points smoothly. It is equally important to avoid vague comments that can lead to confusion and ensure that the feedback is focused on actions and behaviors, not personal attributes.
After the meeting, engineering managers should provide continuous support and resources for the team to implement the feedback. Follow-up meetings should be scheduled to discuss progress and any obstacles the team might face. This ongoing engagement shows that you are committed to their development and success.
Giving constructive criticism can be a tedious task, so we’ve gathered some tips that you can utilize to give effective constructive criticism:
Provide actionable feedback
Give positive comments
Adopt a friendly tone
Provide support
Reward improvement
Effective constructive criticism involves a combination of suggestions for improvement and practical advice for growth. It must also provide clear instructions on what needs improvement. Managers need to be ready to discuss the steps team members should take for personal development.
The goal of constructive criticism is not just to pinpoint areas of improvement. Rather, it aims to help team members become better contributors to the team. So, it’s important for managers to make sure to give positive comments, which include highlighting the efforts of the individuals that have yielded positive results. When team members feel like their work is being noticed and appreciated, they’re motivated to further improve themselves. While intrinsic motivation drives individuals, it is motivation from the appreciation of one's work that achieves the deliverables of a product.
Giving criticism can be uncomfortable when there’s a divide between what is being said and how the speaker delivers the criticism. It’s important for managers to use a friendly tone and keep their body language at ease so that the other person does not feel awkward. Any slight annoyance or frustration can lead to the other person getting defensive, impeding the goal of constructive criticism.
Words without actions never yield great results. When offering constructive criticism, it’s crucial for managers to suggest tools or offer training so that the team members can take practical steps toward making real-time improvements. Offering supportive solutions demonstrates a manager’s commitment to their team member’s success and growth, which ultimately contributes to the development of the team as a whole and promotes effective team dynamics.
Constructive criticism is not just limited to giving criticism, it’s an ongoing process that requires a follow-up. Managers need to notice, recognize, and commend any improvements—regardless of how small they may be. Acknowledging the progress of team members reinforces the value of their efforts and gives them motivation to grow as individuals. Moreover, such a practice builds a culture of trust and continuous improvement.
Constructive criticism is a feedback approach designed to address the shortcomings of team members without making them feel discouraged or unmotivated. It promotes an environment where everyone feels valued and empowered to seek assistance and work toward personal growth and development.
Free Resources